Arun Kasi & Co | Malaysia | Maritime & Shipping Lawyers

No Shortcuts: Closing Procedural Bypass for Wrongful Arrest Damages

No Shortcuts: Closing Procedural Bypass for Wrongful Arrest Damages

No Shortcuts: Closing the Procedural Bypass for Wrongful Arrest Damages The Court of Appeal in The Alkyon has confirmed that the path to claiming damages for wrongful ship arrest remains exceptionally narrow. While acknowledging that the court has the discretionary power to require an arresting party to provide a cross-undertaking in damages, it firmly rejected […]

Loading

The Undertaking’s Bite: When a Ship Arrest Goes Wrong

Undertaking's Bite When a Ship Arrest Goes Wrong

The Undertaking’s Bite: When a Ship Arrest Goes Wrong Arresting a vessel is a powerful tool to secure a maritime claim, but the undertaking given to the Admiralty Marshal to obtain the arrest is a live wire that may result in severe financial consequences. The decision of the High Court in The Astoria provides a […]

Loading

A Phoenix from the Fund: How Ship Arrest Rights Survive a Court Sale

A phoenix, fund and ship, representing "A Phoenix from the Fund: How Ship Arrest Rights Survive a Court Sale"

The Maritime Brief Insights from Arun Kasi & Co The Maritime Brief Insights from Arun Kasi & Co A Phoenix from the Fund: How Ship Arrest Rights Survive a Court Sale The question of whether a claimant can commence an action in rem following the judicial sale of a vessel is one of considerable practical […]

Loading

The Package Deal: Admissibility of Ancillary Claims along with the Principal Claim for Necessaries Supplies in Admiralty Jurisdiction

The Package Deal: Admissibility of Ancillary Claims along with the Principal Claim for Necessaries Supplies in Admiralty Jurisdiction

The Package Deal:Admissibility of Ancillary Claims along with Principal Claims for Necessaries Supplies in Admiralty Jurisdiction Admiralty jurisdiction under section 20(2)(m) of the Senior Courts Act 1981, which covers claims “in respect of goods or materials supplied to a ship for her operation or maintenance,” has been the subject of critical judicial interpretation. This article […]

Loading

Beyond the Name on the Contract: Unmasking the True Debtor to Secure an Arrest

Beyond the Name on the Contract: Unmasking the True Debtor to Secure an Arrest

It is a common scenario in the maritime industry that a supply or repair contract is signed with one company, but the vessel is owned by another. When the bill goes unpaid, is the vessel liable to answer? A High Court ruling concerning the barge “November” provides a vital answer, affirming that courts can and will unmask the true debtor by analysing the commercial sense of the deal and applying the principle of undisclosed agency.

Loading

Ship Manager’s Right to Arrest: A Tale of Two Agreements

A Ship Manager's Right to Arrest: A Tale of Two Agreements

The Maritime Brief Insights from Arun Kasi & Co The Maritime Brief Insights from Arun Kasi & Co A Ship Manager’s Right to Arrest: A Tale of Two Agreements When can a ship manager arrest a vessel for unpaid fees? The answer hinges on a crucial distinction in Admiralty law, recently explored in The Victor […]

Loading

The Unbreakable Link: Connecting the Claim Ship to the Arrest Ship

Image of two ships, representing a claim ship and an arrest ship, and the connection required

The Maritime Brief Insights from Arun Kasi & Co The Maritime Brief Insights from Arun Kasi & Co The Unbreakable Link: Connecting the Claim Ship to the Arrest Ship Hooking the right ship to arrest – The ‘Connection Test’. It dictates that the ship to which a claim relates under s 20(2) of the Senior […]

Loading